This week, we have come to realise the importance of learning from history. With the British MPs choosing to bomb ISIS in Syria, they are promising to right the wrongs of the Iraq War. With Brazil embroiled in economic turmoil and political chaos, it is clear that President Rousseff has not learnt the value of sound economic governance. With the ongoing UN climate change conference, there is hope that the lessons have been learnt from the Copenhagen Conference in 2009 which ended with little to show for it. Finally, as the US prepares for its first rate hike in over half a decade, we hope that they have learnt from the ECB who tried to raise interest rates in 2011 despite the ongoing debt crisis and even today, is still paying the price.
Yuan be with us?
What happened? The Yuan, finally gained approval this week to be included in the IMF “Special Drawing Rights” (SDR) Basket. The Chinese currency is the 5th to be included in the basket, along with the Pound, the Dollar, the Euro and the Yen, and cements the Yuan’s place as a global reserve currency.
What’s going behind the scenes? As noted by Christine Lagarde, Managing Director of the IMF, this marks a major ‘milestone’ for China in its steps to integrate with the global financial system. In including the Yuan in the SDR basket, the IMF is acknowledging that the Chinese currency plays a major role in global trade and is “freely usable” for fund transactions, the two conditions required for approval. Consequently, it signifies the IMF’s recognition of China’s efforts to liberalise its financial markets and allow for the free flow of capital across its borders; most notably, its August devaluation of over 3% where the Chinese central bank allowed the market to have a greater say in setting the daily trading band for the currency.
Why is this important? Within the SDR basket, the Yuan has a weighting of just over 10%, making it the third biggest currency in the basket after the Dollar and Euro. Its inclusion is no small matter, as the SDR is a very important asset which is traded internationally for the freely exchanged currencies that make up the basket and at the same time, the weightings of the SDR basket determine the interest rates that the IMF charges for loans to members. Nonetheless, as the Yuan will only be officially included in the basket from September 2016 onwards, the significance of this announcement lies in its symbolism.
A wild week adds to Brazil’s woes
What happened? It’s been a truly tumultuous week for those in Brazil; even more corruption charges were thrown at the country’s biggest firm Petrobas, the economy apparently shrank at a record 4.5% year-on-year in the third quarter and to top it all off, its president Dilma Rousseff is facing impeachment for playing with the national accounts.
What’s going behind the scenes?
- For over a year, Petrobas has been at the centre of what is Brazil’s biggest corruption scandal in history and this week brought even more allegations. At its heart, Petrobas executives have been accused of bribing politicans for contracts, using company profit. Prominent Brazilian politicians and businessmen have already been arrested for their involvement; most notably, billionaire André Esteves who was chief executive of Brazil’s investment bank, BTG Patual, was arrested this week along with Delcídio Amaral, the first sitting congressman to be detained in Brazil’s democratic history.
- Opposition politicians this week began impeachment proceedings against President Dilma Rousseff over claims that she used accounting tricks to make the state finances appear less dire than they actually were. This simply adds to the state of political chaos that Brazil is currently in, as it is the Speaker of the lower house Eduardo Cunha who is calling for the impeachment, likely to save his own skin as he also faces calls to be unseated.
- Unsurprisingly then, the Brazilian economy is doing horrifically as all of the economic indicators are in free fall. Latin America’s largest economy is contracting at the fastest rate since the Great Depression, unemployment has almost doubled since last year to 8%, inflation is in double digits for the first time in over a decade 2012 and the budget deficit is now at 9.5% of GDP.
Why is this important? This simply demonstrates the importance of economic competence; voted in on a platform to raise standards of living in Brazil, Rousseff has catastrophically failed to meet that expectation and from there, everything has unravelled. The economy is in a dire state of affairs due to her economic mismanagement and overspending in her first term, and although she is now trying to pass spending cuts and fiscal reforms through Congress, her loss of popularity is preventing her from passing able to pass those measures, further exacerbating the problems.
The spectre of Iraq, Afghanistan and Libya looms
What happened? This week, the House of Commons debated a motion to extend air strikes against Isis from Iraq into Syria and after a gruelling parliamentary session of 10 hours, 397 MPs backed the motion with 223 against, a majority of 174 MPs.
What’s going behind the scenes? The build-up to the decision was not without drama; Prime Minister David Cameron was strongly criticised for making some highly personal attacks by suggesting that those who opposed the bombing were “a bunch of terrorist sympathizers”. At the same time, the very issue of bombing Syria created a sharp divide within the Labour party as their leader Jeremy Corbyn, who is strongly anti-war, backed down from his intentions to whip the Labour ministers into voting against the motion and gave in to pressure to give his cabinet ministers a free vote.
Why is this important? As mentioned by Jeremy Corbyn, “the spectre of Iraq, Afghanistan and Libya looms” over this decision and although the vote was technically voting for action in Syria, it was more a vote about the role of Britain on the world stage. The debate about British interventionism has lasted decades as back in the 1990s as it was the slowness of the Western allies (including Britain) to intervene in Bosnia that allowed war crimes to be committed, thousands to die and millions to become refugees. The stance on interventionism has changed dramatically over the years; from being pro-interventionism following the successes in Kosovo and Sierra Leone, Britain has been against it as the Iraq War and intervention in Libya have become engraved into the conscience of the public as a grave mistake. Perhaps, now with terrorism as a resurging threat, that mood has changed once again.
As mentioned in our previous blog posts, December is set to be the crucial month for monetary policy and just a few days in, there are clear signs that this is the case. Mario Draghi extended the timeline for the ECB’s QE programme to March 2017 and the asset purchases would be extended from just sovereign debt to municipal debt (i.e. debt issued by regional and local governments) but disappointingly, the pace of monthly purchases was maintained at €60bn a month. Nonetheless, the ECB did cut deposit rates even further to 0.3%. Meanwhile, on the other side of the ocean, Janet Yellen made the case for a rate hike as she stated that the US economy has “recovered substantially” from the Great Recession and is set for further growth and firmer inflation.
Delegates from 195 countries descended on Paris this week for the United Nations Climate Change Conference (COP21) to discuss the best way to tackle what is regard by the some as the biggest threat to humanity in history, climate change. After the failure of the Kyoto protocol to force countries to cut emissions, the focus is now on voluntary action plans where countries make pledges to do their part to save the environment. The key issue at the heart of the talks is that rich countries grew rich from exploiting fossil fuels during the industrial revolutions and poor countries who are now trying to do the same, are being told not to.
Mark Zuckerburg, founder and CEO of Facebook, made a bold statement by outlining a plan to donate 99% of his $45bn wealth in Facebook shares to charity, following the birth of his daughter Maxima this week. Nonetheless, the entrepreneur has attracted criticism because by donating the shares through the Chan Zuckerberg Initiative, a Limited Liability Company, Zuckerburg can avoid tax on the sale of his shares but he stresses that using this corporate structure gives him the flexibility to fund non-profit organizations and make private investments on issues of public policy.